I did not reply to the First Examination Report. Is my application gone?
Under Section 21 an application is deemed abandoned if it is not put in order for grant within the period the Rules allow. That period can be extended, but only if the extension is requested before it runs out. Once abandonment has happened there is no ordinary route back, and requests for relief afterwards succeed only rarely.
What the law actually says
The first examination report, usually called the FER, is the Controller's list of everything wrong with the application. Section 21 says the application must be put in order for grant within the prescribed period, and Rule 24B currently sets that at six months from the date the report is issued. The clock starts on the date of the report, not on the date the applicant or the agent happened to read it.
The Rules allow that six months to be stretched by up to three further months. The condition is strict: the request on Form 4, with the fee prescribed in the First Schedule, must reach the Office while the original six months is still running. A request made afterwards is out of time, and the Rules do not provide a way of curing that.
Abandonment under Section 21 is automatic. Nobody passes an order refusing the application, so there is nothing that looks like a decision. This matters when people ask about appeals. Section 117A lists the decisions, orders and directions that can be taken to the High Court, and a deemed abandonment is not a refusal under Section 15. An ordinary appeal will usually not lie against something the Act made happen by itself.
Two further points are worth being blunt about. Putting the application in order means dealing with every requirement, including the formal ones. A reply that answers the substantive objections and leaves a formality untouched has not put the application in order. And while Rule 138 gives a general power to condone a delay of up to six months, its application to this particular period has been disputed, and earlier versions of the rule carved parts of Rule 24B out of it. It cannot be described as a remedy the applicant can count on.
What follows from it
- The application is deemed abandoned and cannot proceed to grant.
- No order is passed and no communication is issued, so the position is often discovered long after the event.
- An appeal under Section 117A is generally unavailable, because there is no refusal order to appeal against.
- The published specification stays public and becomes prior art against any fresh filing for the same invention.
- Divisional applications can no longer be filed, since Section 16 requires the parent to be pending.
- Work already invested in searches, drafting and prosecution produces no enforceable Indian right.
What options exist
Extension request while the period is still running Usually available
If the six months has not yet expired, a request on Form 4 with the prescribed fee buys up to three further months. This is the one route that is straightforward, and it needs no justification. It stops working the moment the six months ends, which is why the decision has to be taken early rather than in the last fortnight.
Ask the Controller to condone the delay under Rule 138 Rarely available
Rule 138 allows the Controller to extend a time set by the Rules or condone a delay by up to six months, on a request in Form 4. Whether it reaches the period for putting an application in order is contested, because Rule 24B has its own extension machinery and a specific provision usually governs over a general one. The request must be made inside the six-month window and is decided at the Controller's discretion.
High Court writ jurisdiction Rarely available
Courts have occasionally set aside a deemed abandonment where the applicant showed the default was not its own, for instance an agent who received the report and never told the client, and where the applicant acted promptly once it learned the truth. These are fact-specific decisions. Long delay in discovering the problem, or in approaching the court, weakens the case considerably.
Continue any divisional already on file Limited
If a divisional application was filed while the parent was still pending, the abandonment of the parent does not by itself end the divisional. It stands on its own and has its own examination timetable. This only helps applicants who happened to file one in time; a divisional cannot be created after the parent has gone.
The labels above describe how often a route is realistically available in general practice — not a prediction about your matter. Relief that depends on the Controller's discretion is never an entitlement.
How to stop it happening again
- Diarise the reply date from the date printed on the examination report, not from the date it reached your inbox.
- Decide by the fourth month whether an extension will be needed, so Form 4 goes in with room to spare.
- Answer every objection in the report, including formalities, sequence listings and outstanding statements.
- Ask the agent for written confirmation, with the filing receipt, each time a reply or extension is filed.
- Keep the address for service and the contact email on the Patent Office record accurate whenever people or offices change.
A Pune sensor startup and an unread report
Thermion Labs Pvt Ltd developed a vibration sensor for pump housings and filed an Indian application. The examination report was issued and emailed by the agent to the founder's old company address. The startup had moved offices twice and had changed its email domain. Nothing bounced back to the agent, and nothing reached the founders. The six months ran out, and then the three months that could have been asked for. Roughly nine months later a distributor's diligence check showed the application as abandoned. Counsel reviewed the position. The Rule 138 window had closed. A writ petition was considered, but the founders had taken almost a year to notice, and that delay was hard to explain. The company instead filed a fresh application on a later sensor variant using a different mounting arrangement. This is a simplified illustration; the result in any real matter depends on its own dates and evidence.
Simplified illustration only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts.
Questions people ask
How long do I actually have to reply to an FER?
Rule 24B currently gives six months from the date the first examination report is issued to put the application in order for grant. A further three months can be obtained, but only on a request in Form 4 filed before the six months expires. Because the Rules have been amended several times, the period applying to a particular application should be checked against Rule 24B as it stands, together with the date on the report itself. Do not rely on remembered figures.
Can I file the extension request after the six months has ended?
No. The extension route works only while the original period is still open. Once the six months has run, the application has already been deemed abandoned by operation of Section 21, and there is nothing left to extend. This is the single most common misunderstanding on this topic. Applicants often assume that paying a higher fee later will fix it, in the way late fees work elsewhere. The Rules do not work that way here.
Is abandonment the same thing as refusal?
No, and the difference decides which remedies exist. A refusal is an order passed by the Controller under Section 15, usually after a hearing, with reasons, and it can be appealed to the High Court under Section 117A. An abandonment under Section 21 is not an order at all. It is a consequence the Act attaches to the passing of time. Because there is no decision, the ordinary appeal route is generally closed, which pushes applicants towards writ jurisdiction instead.
My agent never told me about the report. Does that change anything?
It may be relevant, but it is not a cure. Courts examining deemed abandonment have looked at whether the applicant itself was diligent, whether it kept its contact details current, whether it followed up on a file it knew was pending, and how quickly it acted once it discovered the problem. An agent's failure is one fact among several. It has helped some applicants and not others. A professional would need to read the correspondence and the Office records before forming any view.
Can I file the same invention again?
The application will have been published, and that publication is prior art from its publication date. A fresh application claiming the same invention will normally be met with the applicant's own earlier specification. What can sometimes be filed is a later development that the earlier document neither described nor made obvious. Establishing that requires a document-by-document comparison, and it is not something to assume before that comparison has been done.
Not sure whether your FER deadline has already passed?
MYCrave Consultancy & Services can read the file wrapper and confirm which dates apply to your application.