Rule 19 of the Patents Rules, 2003
International applications filed with appropriate office as receiving office
Rule 19 lets the Indian Patent Office act as a PCT receiving office for applicants connected to India and governs how those filings are handled.
Official legal text
The verbatim statutory text of this provision is reproduced from the official source and checked by our legal reviewer before it is published here. Until that check is complete for this page, read the exact wording directly from the official source linked below — it is the only version that governs.
The authority is the enacted text, not this page. Where our wording and the official provision, or an applicable Gazette notification, do not match, the official material prevails.
What this rule requires, step by step
A receiving office is the counter at which an international application is filed. It checks that the papers meet the Treaty's basic requirements, accords the international filing date, collects the fees, and then sends the record copy to the International Bureau in Geneva and the search copy to the International Searching Authority. Rule 19 is the provision that puts the Indian Patent Office behind that counter. It allows an appropriate office in India to receive international applications where at least one applicant is a national or a resident of India, and it sets out how those applications are dealt with.
Using the Indian receiving office has practical advantages for Indian applicants. The paperwork is filed at home in English, the transmittal fee is paid to the Indian office at the rate given in the First Schedule, and correspondence is with an office in the applicant's own time zone. The other fees payable at this stage, the international filing fee that goes to the International Bureau and the search fee that goes to the searching authority, are fixed under the Treaty and are payable as prescribed. Fee amounts change from time to time, so always work from the current schedules rather than an older figure.
What the receiving office does not do is examine the invention. It has no power to say whether the claims are novel or inventive. Its checks are formal: is there something that looks like a description and a claim, is an applicant entitled to file here, is the language acceptable, are the fees paid. If the formalities are met, the application gets an international filing date that has effect in every designated country, which is the whole point of the system.
There is one Indian issue that must not be overlooked. Section 39 stops a person resident in India from applying for a patent outside India for an invention unless written permission has been obtained under Rule 71 on Form 31, or unless an application for the same invention has been on file in India for at least six weeks with no secrecy direction in force. Filing an international application through the Indian receiving office is treated as filing in India, so this route does not by itself create a Section 39 problem. Choosing a foreign receiving office or the International Bureau instead, without permission or a qualifying earlier Indian filing, very much can, and the consequences under Section 40 include the Indian patent being liable to be revoked.
Finally, keep the calendar in view. An international application claiming priority from an earlier filing must normally be filed within twelve months of that earlier date. Filing internationally buys time to decide where protection is worth paying for, and India itself is entered within thirty-one months of the priority date.
Why this rule matters
Indian inventors, startups, universities and companies who want protection abroad, and any applicant where at least one co-applicant is an Indian national or resident.
When international protection is being sought, usually within twelve months of the first Indian filing.
The power for Indian offices to act as a PCT receiving office, and a route by which one filing preserves rights in many countries.
Applicants file abroad through the wrong channel, breach the foreign filing restriction in Section 39, or miss the twelve month priority window and lose the earlier date.
How it works in practice
One filing, many options, no Section 39 problem
Tessellate Materials Pvt Ltd, a five-person startup in Nagpur, filed a complete specification in India in March for a low-cost thermal insulation panel. By the following January the founders had interest from buyers in Germany and Brazil but no budget to file in either country. Their agent filed an international application at the Indian receiving office in the eleventh month, claiming priority from the March filing. Three fees were paid: a transmittal fee to the Indian office at the rate in the First Schedule, and the international filing and search fees fixed under the Treaty. Because the filing was made in India, the foreign filing restriction in Section 39 was not engaged. The record copy went to the International Bureau and the search copy to the searching authority. Tessellate now had until thirty-one months from March to decide which countries justified the cost, and it used the search report to drop two weak claims before spending anything on national phase entries.
Simplified illustration only. Actual legal outcomes depend on the facts.
Key points to remember
- An Indian office can act as a PCT receiving office where at least one applicant is an Indian national or resident.
- The receiving office checks formalities and accords the international filing date; it does not examine patentability.
- It sends the record copy to the International Bureau and the search copy to the searching authority.
- Three fees arise at this stage: a transmittal fee in the First Schedule, and the international filing and search fees fixed under the Treaty.
- Filing through the Indian receiving office is treated as a filing in India for the purposes of the foreign filing restriction.
- An international application claiming priority is normally filed within twelve months of the earliest application.
- The PCT does not grant a worldwide patent; every country still decides for itself.
Common mistakes and misunderstandings
- Believing the PCT gives an international patent. It only preserves the option to seek patents country by country.
- Filing directly with a foreign office or the International Bureau while resident in India, without permission under Section 39, and putting any Indian patent at risk.
- Missing the twelve month priority window and filing internationally with no benefit of the earlier Indian date.
- Assuming the receiving office assesses the invention. Its role is formal only; the search report comes later from the searching authority.
Connected provisions
A rule is subordinate legislation. It is made by the Central Government under a rule-making power in the Act and is amended by notification rather than by Parliament. The parent sections are listed on their own so that the source and the procedure are never confused.
Forms, deadlines and fees
- An international application claiming priority from an earlier application is normally filed within twelve months of that earlier filing date.
- Where a resident of India wishes to file abroad without a qualifying earlier Indian application, written permission under Section 39 must be obtained before filing; otherwise an Indian application must have been on file for at least six weeks with no secrecy direction.
- India is entered as a national phase within thirty-one months from the priority date.
Open the deadline calculator — and have every date confirmed against the current Rules before you rely on it.
This site does not carry a fee table. The First Schedule to the Patents Rules is the source, the rates vary with the applicant's category and with the mode of filing, and a figure quoted second-hand goes out of date quietly. How Indian patent fees work.
Related judgments
Case law is added slowly and deliberately. A summary is drafted, checked against the reported judgment and then reviewed before publication, because a wrong case note can mislead a reader badly. No summary for this provision has reached publication yet. How case notes are prepared.
Questions people ask about Rule 19
Who can file a PCT application at the Indian Patent Office?
The Indian office acts as a receiving office where at least one applicant is a national or a resident of India. If a startup with Indian founders files jointly with a foreign co-applicant, the Indian connection of one applicant is enough. Applicants with no Indian connection use their own national receiving office or the International Bureau. The application is filed with the appropriate Indian office determined under Rule 18, which is the branch whose jurisdiction covers the first-mentioned applicant.
Does filing a PCT application in India satisfy Section 39?
Filing an international application through the Indian receiving office is treated as making the application in India, so it does not by itself breach the restriction on residents applying abroad. The restriction bites when a person resident in India files outside India without written permission and without having had an Indian application on file for at least six weeks free of any secrecy direction. If you plan to file first through a foreign office, obtain permission under Rule 71 on Form 31 before you file.
What does a PCT application cost at the Indian receiving office?
Three separate fees arise: a transmittal fee payable to the Indian office at the rate given in the First Schedule to the Patents Rules, an international filing fee payable to the International Bureau, and a search fee payable to the searching authority you choose. The Indian fee has lower rates for natural persons, startups, small entities and educational institutions. The international fees are set under the Treaty and revised periodically. Check the current schedules before budgeting, and remember national phase costs come later.
How long does a PCT application give me before I must file in other countries?
The international phase gives a planning window measured from the priority date, which is usually the date of your first application. India is entered as a national phase within thirty-one months of that date, and most other countries use thirty or thirty-one months. During that window you receive an international search report and a written opinion, so you can judge the strength of the invention before committing to translation and filing costs. Each country's deadline must be checked individually, because they are not identical.
Filing your international patent application from India?
MYCrave Consultancy handles PCT filings at the Indian receiving office and the Section 39 clearance behind them.
You will be speaking with MYCrave Consultancy & Services, the firm that operates this platform. General questions are answered free; matter‑specific work is quoted before anything is done.