Rule 26 of the Patents Rules, 2003
Request for withdrawal
Prescribes the form on which an applicant asks the Patent Office to withdraw a pending patent application.
Official legal text
The verbatim statutory text of this provision is reproduced from the official source and checked by our legal reviewer before it is published here. Until that check is complete for this page, read the exact wording directly from the official source linked below — it is the only version that governs.
This explanation is written for clarity, not for citation. The official statutory text and any Gazette notification in force on your date govern, and they prevail over anything said here.
What this rule requires, step by step
Not every application should be pursued to the end. Prior art may surface, the product may be dropped, the budget may run out, or a better specification may be ready to file. The Act lets an applicant withdraw at any time before grant, and Rule 26 supplies the mechanics: the request is made on Form 29.
Timing decides how much benefit withdrawal gives. If the request is made early enough, before the office has set the publication process in motion, the application is never published. The invention stays confidential and can be protected as a trade secret or filed again in a better form. The Act requires the withdrawal to be made a set period before the publication date for this to work, so an applicant who wants to preserve secrecy must act well before the eighteen month point, not in the final week.
There is also a money dimension. Where an application is withdrawn before the first examination report has issued, the fee rules allow a part of the examination fee to be refunded. The amount is set in the First Schedule and changes from time to time, so the current fee position should be checked rather than assumed.
Withdrawal is deliberate and final. It is different from an application being deemed abandoned because a deadline was missed, and different from refusal after examination. Once the request takes effect the application is gone. If the application was already published before withdrawal, the disclosure stays public and remains prior art, including against the applicant's own later filings for the same invention.
Two connected points are often missed. First, a divisional application can only be filed while the parent is pending, so withdrawing the parent closes that route. Second, if the application is part of an international family, withdrawing in India has no effect on the other members, but the reasons for withdrawal usually apply to them too and should be reviewed.
Why this rule matters
Applicants who decide not to pursue an application, and their advisers managing portfolio cost and confidentiality.
Any time before grant, but the real decision point is well before the eighteen month publication date.
A formal route to end an application by choice, with confidentiality and fee consequences that depend on timing.
The application drifts to publication or abandonment, secrecy is lost by default and a recoverable part of the examination fee is never claimed.
How it works in practice
A Surat firm withdraws in time and keeps its process secret
Sarvodaya Dyes Pvt Ltd of Surat files an application in January for a low-water dyeing process. In August a search commissioned for a licensing discussion turns up a Chinese publication from two years earlier that discloses the same sequence of steps. The claims cannot be saved. The firm's adviser points out that the application will publish eighteen months after filing unless it is withdrawn in time, and that the specification describes an in-house catalyst ratio that competitors have never seen. The firm files Form 29 well before the publication date. The application is never published, the catalyst ratio stays a trade secret protected by confidentiality agreements with staff, and part of the examination fee is refunded because the first examination report had not issued. The firm's chemists later develop a genuinely different fixing step and file a fresh application for that, unhindered by any earlier publication of their own.
Simplified illustration only. Actual legal outcomes depend on the facts.
Key points to remember
- Withdrawal is requested on Form 29 and can be made at any time before grant.
- Withdrawing in time, before the publication process starts, keeps the invention out of the public domain.
- A part of the examination fee may be refundable if withdrawal happens before the first examination report issues.
- Withdrawal by choice is different from deemed abandonment for missing a deadline.
- Once an application has been published, withdrawal does not remove the disclosure from the public domain.
- A divisional application cannot be filed once the parent has been withdrawn.
Common mistakes and misunderstandings
- Withdrawing at the last minute and still finding the application published, because the request came too close to the publication date.
- Assuming withdrawal erases an application that has already been published. The disclosure remains prior art forever.
- Simply stopping payment or ignoring the office instead of filing the form, which produces abandonment rather than a clean withdrawal.
- Withdrawing a parent application before filing any divisional that was under consideration.
Connected provisions
A rule is subordinate legislation. It is made by the Central Government under a rule-making power in the Act and is amended by notification rather than by Parliament. The parent sections are listed on their own so that the source and the procedure are never confused.
Forms, deadlines and fees
Prescribed forms sit in the Second Schedule to the Patents Rules. The Schedule is updated along with the Rules, so the safe practice is to download the form on the day you prepare it and check that it is the current version.
- To prevent publication, the withdrawal request must be made at least three months before the eighteen month publication date.
- For a part refund of the examination fee, the withdrawal must come before the first examination report issues.
Open the deadline calculator — and have every date confirmed against the current Rules before you rely on it.
Any official fee connected with this provision is fixed by the First Schedule to the Patents Rules, not by the provision itself. The amount depends on who the applicant is and on whether the filing is made online or on paper, so no figures are reproduced here. How Indian patent fees work.
Amendment history
What changed in this provision, newest first. Read the footnotes in the official consolidated text for the full record.
- 2016The Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2016The rule was replaced and a specific form was prescribed for withdrawing an application.
Compiled from official consolidated texts and Gazette notifications. See the site-wide change log.
Related judgments
Court decisions shape how this provision is applied, but a summary is useful only if it is right. Every case note on this site is read by a legal reviewer before it goes live, and none has been completed for this provision so far. This section will fill in as those reviews finish. How case notes are prepared.
Questions people ask about Rule 26
Can I withdraw an application after it has been published?
Yes, you can still withdraw it, and doing so saves further costs. What you cannot do is undo the publication. The specification stays available to the public and continues to count as prior art against everyone, including you. So withdrawal after publication is a cost decision, not a confidentiality decision. If secrecy is the aim, the request has to be filed well before the publication date arrives.
Will I get my fees back if I withdraw?
Partly, and only in defined situations. The fee rules provide for a portion of the examination fee to be refunded where the application is withdrawn before the first examination report has issued. Filing fees are generally not returned. The refundable proportion is fixed by the First Schedule and is revised from time to time, so check the current fee schedule before deciding, and make the refund request with the withdrawal rather than afterwards.
Can I refile the same invention after withdrawing?
Only if the application was never published and the invention has not otherwise become public. In that case a fresh, better-drafted application is possible, though you lose the original date and take the risk of anything published in the meantime. If the application was published before withdrawal, your own publication defeats a refiling for the same invention. A refiling should therefore claim genuine improvements, not the same subject matter.
What is the difference between withdrawal and abandonment?
Withdrawal is a deliberate act by the applicant using the prescribed form, and its timing can be managed to protect confidentiality and recover part of the examination fee. Abandonment happens by default when a deadline passes without compliance, most often the period for putting the application in order for grant. Abandonment gives none of the benefits of a timed withdrawal, which is why an applicant who has decided to stop should file the form rather than simply going quiet.
Thinking of dropping a pending patent application?
MYCrave Consultancy times the withdrawal to protect confidentiality and recover what can be recovered.
You will be speaking with MYCrave Consultancy & Services, the firm that operates this platform. General questions are answered free; matter‑specific work is quoted before anything is done.