Independent educational platform. Not a government website and not the Indian Patent Office. Who we are
MYCrave Consultancy & Services PatentActIndia.comA MYCrave Initiative
Patents ActPatents RulesProcessGuidesToolsForms A–ZForms & FeesCase lawCompareWhat happens if…Who is applyingDeadlinesGlossaryWorked examplesUpdatesSearchSite mapAsk a QuestionMy LibraryConsult MYCrave
PATENTS ACTIn forceChapter XXI

Section 130 of the Patents Act, 1970

Removal from register of patent agents and restoration

About 5 min read Last reviewed 19 August 2026 Chapter XXI — Patent Agents
In one line

Lets the Controller remove a patent agent's name from the register in defined situations, and lets a removed name be restored.

Official legal text

Official text — Section 130, the Patents Act, 1970 Official source ↗
Official wording not yet mirrored on this page.
The verbatim statutory text of this provision is reproduced from the official source and checked by our legal reviewer before it is published here. Until that check is complete for this page, read the exact wording directly from the official source linked below — it is the only version that governs.

This is a simplified explanation. Where it differs from the official text of the provision, or from an applicable Gazette notification, the official text and the notification prevail.

What this section says, in plain language

A register is only useful if it is kept clean. Section 130 gives the Controller the power to take a name off the register of patent agents. The recognised situations are practical ones: the agent has died, the agent asks for the name to be removed, the prescribed fee that keeps registration alive has not been paid, the agent no longer holds the qualifications required by section 126, or the agent has been found guilty of professional misconduct or is otherwise disqualified under the rules.

The consequences of removal are immediate and complete. The rights given by section 127 belong to registered agents, so a person whose name is off the register cannot practise before the Controller, cannot sign communications under section 128, and cannot hold out as an agent. Continuing to work as an agent after removal is not a technical slip; it is the conduct that section 123 is aimed at.

The section also provides the way back. On an application by the person concerned, the Controller may restore the name to the register. Rule 116 governs removal and rule 117 governs restoration, including the application to be made and the fees prescribed in the First Schedule that must be cleared. Where the removal was for non-payment, restoration is usually a matter of paying what is due within the time the rules allow. Where it followed misconduct, the Controller looks at the substance before allowing a return, and time limits apply, so the current rules should be checked rather than assumed.

Fairness runs through the process. A removal on grounds such as misconduct or disqualification is not made behind the person's back; notice and an opportunity to be heard are part of the procedure, and the outcome is published so that the public record matches reality. For clients, the important point is that removal of an agent does not damage their patent application. The file continues. What must happen quickly is the appointment of a new registered agent, a fresh authorisation on record, and a check of every deadline that is running.

Why this section matters

Who it affects

Registered patent agents, persons seeking restoration, and clients whose agent's status changes mid-case.

When it matters

When fees fall due, when a complaint of misconduct is made, and when a removed agent wants to return to practice.

What it creates

A power to remove names for defined reasons, a right to be heard before that happens, and a route to restoration.

If it is ignored

An agent can lose the right to practise simply by missing a fee, and clients left with an unauthorised representative may miss office communications and deadlines.

How it works in practice

Worked example

A missed fee interrupts a Nagpur agent's practice

Prashant Deshmukh has been a registered patent agent in Nagpur for eleven years. After shifting his office he forgets to update his address, and the reminder about the fee that keeps his registration in force never reaches him. The fee goes unpaid, and in due course his name is removed from the register. He learns about it only when a client, Shilpa Naik of a Nashik agri-equipment startup, cannot find his entry while doing a routine check. Prashant applies for restoration, pays the amounts due and the prescribed restoration fee, explains the address change, and his name is restored. In the meantime Shilpa does two sensible things: she checks the deadlines on her pending application, and she has a fresh authorisation ready in case the restoration takes time. Nothing is lost, but Prashant now files an address change with the office the same week he moves, and he sets his own calendar reminder rather than relying on the office reminder.

Simplified illustration only. Actual legal outcomes depend on the facts.

Key points to remember

  • Names can be removed on death, on request, for non-payment of the prescribed fee, for loss of qualification, or for professional misconduct.
  • Removal ends the right to practise under section 127 and to sign under section 128.
  • Rule 116 covers removal and rule 117 covers restoration, with fees prescribed in the First Schedule.
  • The person affected gets notice and a hearing where the ground is misconduct or disqualification.
  • Restoration is possible, but time limits set by the rules apply and should be checked in the current version.
  • A client's patent application is not affected by the agent's removal; only representation has to be fixed.

Common mistakes and misunderstandings

  • Treating the periodic fee as optional. Non-payment is one of the commonest reasons a name leaves the register.
  • Assuming removal is permanent. Restoration is expressly provided for, though it must be applied for properly and in time.
  • Continuing to act for clients after removal. That is the situation section 123 exists to deal with.
  • For clients, assuming the patent application dies with the agent's registration. It does not; only the authorisation needs replacing.
  • Forgetting to keep the registered address current, which is how most agents miss the notice that leads to removal.

Connected provisions

Indian patent law works in two layers. The Act carries the substance and the Rules carry the machinery. Because the layers are amended by different processes and at different times, they are presented in separate blocks instead of being merged into one description.

Forms, deadlines and fees

Forms mentioned
  • Form 23 (check the current Second Schedule)

Forms are not set out in the Act. They are prescribed in the Second Schedule to the Patents Rules and are revised from time to time, so obtain the current version from the official website before filing.

Timing
  • The fee that keeps registration in force must be paid at the intervals set by the rules; non-payment can lead to removal.
  • An application for restoration of a removed name must be made within the period allowed by the rules; that period should be confirmed from the current rules before relying on it.

Open the deadline calculator — and have every date confirmed against the current Rules before you rely on it.

Fees

Fees are prescribed in the First Schedule to the Patents Rules. Because the Schedule is revised from time to time, and charges different amounts to different categories of applicant and for physical as against electronic filing, this page describes the fee without stating a figure. How Indian patent fees work.

Related judgments

You will not find case summaries under this heading today. Each one must pass a legal review before it appears, and that work has not been completed for this provision. If you are researching decided cases, use a law report or a court database in the meantime. How case notes are prepared.

Questions people ask about Section 130

Why would a patent agent's name be removed from the register?

Section 130 recognises several grounds: the agent has died, the agent requests removal, the fee that keeps registration in force has not been paid, the agent no longer satisfies the qualifications in section 126, or the agent has been found guilty of professional misconduct or falls under a disqualification in the rules. Non-payment is by far the most common reason in practice. Where the ground involves conduct or disqualification, the agent is given notice and a chance to be heard first.

Can a removed patent agent be restored to the register?

Yes. Section 130 provides for restoration on application to the Controller, and rule 117 sets out how it is done, including the fees prescribed in the First Schedule. Where removal was only for non-payment, restoration is usually straightforward once the dues are cleared within the permitted time. Where removal followed misconduct, the Controller considers the substance before allowing a return. Because the time limits are set by rules that change, check the current version rather than relying on older guidance.

What happens to my patent application if my agent is removed?

Your application is unaffected. The removal touches your agent's right to represent you, not the status of your case. What you must do quickly is appoint another registered agent and file a fresh authorisation, so that office communications reach someone who can act. At the same time, obtain the full file from the previous agent and verify every running deadline, especially the request for examination and any reply to an examination report.

Is an agent told before being removed for misconduct?

Yes. Removal on a ground such as professional misconduct or disqualification follows a process in which the agent receives notice of what is alleged and is given an opportunity to be heard before the decision is made. That is why the procedure in rule 116 matters. Removal for a purely factual reason, such as death or a written request from the agent, does not require the same enquiry, because there is nothing in dispute to hear.

Facing removal, or need your agent's name restored?

MYCrave Consultancy advises on removal proceedings, restoration applications and keeping your patent files properly represented.

You will be speaking with MYCrave Consultancy & Services, the firm that operates this platform. General questions are answered free; matter‑specific work is quoted before anything is done.